Tuesday, 19 November 2013

web 0.2 in education



                                                      web 0.2 in education
 

INTRODUCTION
India can become one of the developing countries in the world by year 2020, if we adopt technology as our tool. For this, the teaching community should change its mindset and enthuse the students by means of technology”
                    -Abdul KALAM (2004)
Computer occupies an important place in world today. Nehru admits technology as “Our major window on the modern world”. Any one, who can know computer, he can keep touch with the whole world. Learning English is very important in the non-English speaking countries like India. However, developing modern technological support for effective English learning is a critical issue in the developing countries like India. The development of language learning technologies recently mobilized, portable, and personalized.  Web 2.0 is an uncertain and unclear concept, which is understood in different ways by different people. Web 2.0 refers to a second-generation. There is no specific Web 2.0 program or software. Web 2.0 is merely a commonly used marketing label.

Web 1.0
World Wide Web (www) that is “read only” to a Web 2.0 that is being described as the “Read Write Web.” Instead of content that was for the most part static, we are starting to see the ability to remix content in different ways, in order to suit our needs. The Web is evolving to become more like an area for social and idea networking. The web surfer negotiates the connections within a social or idea network, exchanges bits of content, creates something new, and then the cycle begins again. Extensible Mark-up Language (XML) content, but Really Simple Syndication (RSS) and Atom feeds in particular, is increasingly becoming a standard for sharing data between these web applications. There is loosely boundary definition of the term Web 1.0 but this term emerged when the Web 2.0 term was introduced. Web 1.0 refers to all web applications before arising of    Web 2.0 (Anderson, 2007).

Web 2.0 – MEANING
In the 21st century, Web 2.0 term states a renaissance for web resources and tools by containing collaboration and social interaction. Web 2.0 includes community learning and collaborative learning in a social process. J.Schneider, (2006, p.4) analyzed the historical evolution process of learning technologies generally by using a schedule below:

The Evolution of Learning Technologies
1960’s- 2010’s
Instructor- Led Training
1970’s- 2010’s
Sound-Video- Multimedia
1980’s- 2010’s
Computer Aided Learning
1990’s- 2010’s
Office Applications
Assessment Tools
Interactive Communication Tools
World Wide Web
e-learning 1.0
2000’s-2010’s
e-learning 2.0
                        Adopted from Schneider, 2006, p.4
According to Rosenberg, E-Learning describes as using of internet technologies for creating and delivering a rich learning environment. This learning environment includes a broad series of solutions, information resources and instruction. The goal of e-Learning is enhancing the individual and the organizational performance (Rosenberg, 2006, p. 72). In Web 1.0, students can access the content that created by someone else. However, in Web 2.0, students can design their own Content (Arsun and Kuru, 2006). O’Reilly (2005) formulated Web 2.0 by some of the examples:
Some Comparative Characteristics of Web 1.0 and Web 2.0
Web 1.0
Web 2.0
Britannica Online
Wikipedia
Personal Websites
Blogging
Content Management Systems
Wikis
Directories ( Taxonomy)
Tagging (Folksonomy )
                                    Adopted from O’Reilly, 2005
 Web 1.0 describes as collection of web sites (read only web sites). Current trends of web technologies and tools are changed today. E-Learning 2.0 and Web 2.0 (read and write web sites) are the popular concepts for all organizations Styles (2006) stated the paradigm shift that Web 2.0 initiated in publication history.

According to Bray Web 2.0 represents a new era of paradigm shift. In this era, there is a transition from traditional software to internet services (Bray, 2007).Transition from the traditional view of e-learning to the dimension of technology aiming collaborative nature of learning refers e-Learning 2.0 E-Learning 2.0 contains:
Discussion forums
Blended learning
Virtual classrooms
Podcasts
Mobile learning
Games
Blogs,
Wikis etc.
By using social software, students have three main communication modes:
     One-to-one communication includes e-mail and instant messaging
     One-to-many communication includes web pages, blogs
     Many-to-many communication includes wikis. (Marhan, 2006).

WEB 2.0 APPLICATIONS
            The term Web 2.0 does not have an exact meaning; however some people see it as a marketing buzzword for financial profit. However numerous people have attempted to define Web 2.0.
Tim O’Reilly after releasing his first paper describing Web 2.0 ideas attempted to come up with a more compact definition from his company’s blog(O'Reilly, 2005):
Web 2.0 is the network as platform, spanning all connected devices; Web 2.0 applications are those that make the most of the intrinsic advantages of that platform: delivering software as a continually-updated service that gets better the more people use it, consuming and remixing data from multiple sources, including individual users, while providing their own data and services in a form that allows remixing by others, creating network effects through an "architecture of participation," and going beyond the page metaphor of Web 1.0 to deliver rich user experiences.”
Another interesting definition is from Kingsley who defined Web 2.0 as a point of presence on the Web for exposing or invoking Web services or Syndicating or Subscribing to Extensible mark-up language (XML) based content. Richad MacManus defined Web 2.0 as “The Web as Platform” depending on individual perspective; that is for marketers, the Web is a platform for communications, for journalists the Web is a platform for new media, for corporate people the Web is a platform for business, for geeks the Web is a platform for software development, etc. (O’Reilly, 2005)
Wikis
According to J.Long, the word Wiki originates from a Hawaiian term which means “quick” or “Super fast”. As popularly known a wiki refers to a web site that anybody can edit (J.Long, 2006). The first wiki was launched by Howard G Cunningham whose wiki site was named as WikiWikiWeb on March 25, 1996 (J.Long,2006).The most popular wiki site is Wikipedia (http://www.wikipedia.org). Other examples of wiki sites are and http://pbwiki.com. The main distinctive feature of any wiki site is that anyone can edit it. The underlying concept of a wiki is the fact that it acts as a collaborative tool and henceforth facilitates more effectively the production of a group work (J.Long, 2006).

“A wiki is essentially a website constructed in such a way as to allow users to change content on the site” (Graeme, 2006). A wiki is used to refer to the created document, the site where it is located and the software to produce it. The key elements of a wiki are:
Ø  Hyper textual structure
Ø  Social authoring - collaborative production
Ø  Process log in “history”            
Ø  Limited use of html - lack of layers, cascade styles, JavaScript
Ø  Dynamic document - always under construction (Graeme, 2006).

Uses of Wiki
            The most uses of wiki obtained from the survey done by Majchrzak et al., (2006) are as follows;
Ø  Wikis are used in e-learning including web design, requirement descriptions, testing, and assignments to training.
Ø  Wiki is used in software development processes such as technical documentation, client approval, issues tracking, internal workflow, quality & process management, software design, reference information, application maintenance and operations.
Ø  Wiki is used in project management for creating deliverables, meeting agendas, status reports, standards and practices.
Ø  Wikis is used for Community of Practice and user groups, and collaboration.
Ø  Wiki is also used to provide technology support including best practices, and
Ø  customer support information-sharing Other wiki uses include tracking interesting marketing trends, collecting data, logging daily lead counts, information on partnerships, notifying users of new features, marketing materials, with some opening up their wikis to selected customers, also it is used in Research and Development (R&D) for product requirements, product information, & commercialization in which everything relating to Research and Development is tracked through the wiki (Majchrzak et al., 2006).


Wikis are used in Education in several ways:
Ø  To support collaborative work, substituting old .doc or .pdf documents.
Ø  To produce a course or study corpus in cooperation with all academic stakeholders: lecturers, students,
Ø  To distribute information to students, in order to facilitate the updating of materials by the professor. (Majchrzak et al., 2006).
Blogs
According to Doctorow, the term blog originally come from the phrase “web-log”, which refers to a simple webpage containing paragraphs of opinion, information, personal diary entries, or links arranged in a chronological order with the most recent entry first in the style of an online journal (Doctorow, 2002). The process of blogging is characterised with posting and commenting blog contents done by blog visitors in which there is an exchange of views between the blog author and contributors who visit the blog and comment on blog contents in conversational manner (Anderson, 2007). Blog entries may include video and other rich media depending on the blogging software or service that is used (Kennedy et al., 2007).
            Examples of commonly known blog sites are http://radar.oreilly.com/ and http://www.techrinch.com/ which are education-based blogs, http://wordpress.org/ and http://www.blogger.com/start which are software blogs, and http://technorati.com/ and http://blogsearch.google.com/ which are blog search services (Kennedy et al., 2007).
            Whereas the wiki is a way of constructing knowledge, a blog is a way of distributing news. Some key elements:
Ø  There are one or several authors that produce entries
Ø  Visitors can add comments
Ø  New entries and comments do not substitute older ones
Ø  It is possible to subscribe in order to receive news via email or through RSS readers.
Entries usually include the source of information, thus validating it. (Kennedy et al., 2007).


Uses of Blogs
According to Haugen & Claire, in education recently there are a considerable number of blogs that have been created for education purposes such as learning and teaching. For instance teachers use blogs to replace the standard class Web pages. Instructors post class times and rules, assignment notifications, suggested readings, and exercises. Aside from the ordering of material by date, students would find nothing unusual in this use of the blog. The instructor, however, finds that the use of blogging software makes this previously difficult chore much simpler (Haugen & Claire, 2006).

In marketing, blogging has also great advantages in business organisations. For instance blogs can be used to promote products and services which can reduce advertising and marketing costs (Haugen & Claire, 2006). In knowledge management blogs can be used for knowledge works in the sense that blog is useful in articulating ideas, experiences, opinions through writing which lead to create new knowledge. Specifically for Education: (klamma et al, 2007)
Ø  Teachers have used blogs as an easy way to produce dynamic learning environments without previous knowledge of html.
Ø  Students have used blogs as an alternative digital portfolio or as a learning log.
Ultimately, blogs have been used as support for collaborative work.
 (Klamma et al, 2007)

Podcasting
Podcasts are audio recording, usually in the form of talks, interview, and lectures which can be played either on a desktop computer or on MP3 devices (Anderson, 2007). Originally podcasts were called audio blogs and were the beginning efforts of adding audio streams to early blogs (Felix & Stolarz, 2006). Podcast listeners normally subscribe to RSS feeds so as to receive new information about new podcasts when they are available. Common example of podcasting sites are: http://btpodshow.com/, and http://odeo.com.  (Felix & Stolarz, 2006).
Uses of Podcasts
Podcasting is increasingly applied in education (Brittain et al., 2006). For instance podcasts are used for recording lectures in the University of Washington (Aldrich et al., 2006). Within an enterprise environment, a podcast can be used for briefings, recordings of conference calls, training, new product updates, leadership messages, and anything that would benefit from verbal and/or video communication to the employees (Davidson, 2006).
According to Moore, podcasts and video podcasts in particular can be helpful when a message needs to be delivered rapidly and consistently. Video podcasting is a recent added feature to podcasting which technically can be described as a combination of video files available for download. Each video files publisher creates a unique Really Simple Syndication (RSS) file. The main objective of RSS in this case is to describe the video and presenting the most current video content available. Video podcasts can also be used when teaching a topic that involves psychomotor skills or many visuals (Moore, 2006).

RSS
RSS (Really Simple Syndication) is a technology which has brought about a significant advance in the fundamental architecture of the web (O'Reilly, 2005). RSS is an XML format which allows users to know about the content of RSS-enabled websites, blogs, or podcasts without necessarily visiting its actual site (Anderson, 2007).
            While most professors introduce blogs in traditional curricula, making the most of their potentialities, students are in general not acquainted very extensively with these new resources. RSS reader pages with their shared entries page, also under RSS syndication rules, have not been introduced as a new way to access information which is based on collective intelligence and collaborative work (styles, 2006 p. 3-5).

Uses of RSS
According to Brandom, RSS is an intermediary tool which supports other Web 2.0 tools like blog and wiki, or any website. For instance, in educational blogs RSS feed can be used by educators and trainers from other blogs to alert them about the latest developments in their field of interest on a regular basis. RSS is a better solution than an email list subscription, as it does not require users to give out their email addresses, avoiding the potential for spammers to obtain their email details (Brandom, 2003).

Mashups
According to bray, Mashup is a term used to refer to a website or webpage that combines data and services from various sources on the Web. Mashups can be divided into seven categories: mapping, search, mobile, messaging, sports, shopping, and movies. More than fourth percent of mashups are mapping mashups. Housing Maps (http://www.housingmaps.com) is one of mashup application which pulls sales and rental information from the classified advertisement Web site Craigslist (http://www.craigslist. com) and displays the listings on interactive maps pulled from Google (Bray,2007).

Uses of Mashups
Mashups have a potential uses such as enabling individuals to find a place to live as housing maps application is used by many people for that purpose, and helping people to purchase goods locally (John & Urs, 2007).

Tagging and Social Bookmarking
According to Voss, Tagging is the association of particular keywords with related content (website, picture or video), such as photo tagging on photo sharing sites or link tagging on collaborative news site. A tag is a keyword which describes a website, picture or video. The basic principle of tagging is that the end users have the power to create their own indices instead of experts only and the assigned tags are immediately available on the web (Voss, 2007).
‘Social bookmarking’ is the trend which was first motivated by the popularity of tagging sites such as del.icio.us (Anderson, 2007). Social bookmarking systems share similar features that allow users to create lists of ‘bookmarks’ or ‘favourites’ that are stored on a remote central server (Millen et al., 2006). While most students and professors make use of the potential of Google when searching for information, they hardly make the most of shared bookmarks as a new information access method based on collaborative selective searching (Anderson, 2007).
According to Anderson, Folksonomy is a term related to tagging concept which refers to the collection of tags created by an individual for personal use. And it is described as a result of tagging practice (Anderson, 2007). Social tagging was seen as a useful way to get a reliable content classification out of a large number of people. (Avram, 2006).

Uses of Tagging

Tagging has become recently a popular approach for sharing information and collaboration. Common examples of applications that apply tags are photos sharing, web pages, and email applications (Muller et al., 2006). Collaborative tagging is used in the enterprise for connecting expertise within the enterprise and can enhance communication through social networks of tags or topics
(Muller et al., 2006).

WEB 2.0 IN EDUCATION
According to John and Seligmamm, Web 2.0 tends to complement, enhance, and add new collaborative dimensions to the classroom. Therefore the main focus of this section will be on how these tools are used in teaching and learning in higher education. As this dissertation is essentially based on examining the usefulness of the tools to enhance the knowledge sharing process then understanding their ubiquity in higher education pave new ways to think about how there could be potential for knowledge sharing among academics in higher education and hence improving knowledge creation as well as innovation in the academic universe of discourse (John and Seligmamm, 2006).

Wikis
According to Parker and chao, Wikis are largely used in education for both teaching and learning. Wikis can be used in the classroom to support many learning approaches. Learning approaches that could most be supported by wikis are collaborative learning and the constructivist learning paradigms. Collaborative learning is a learning process in which students work together in different mixed groups to support the learning of their individual members. The collaborative features of wikis may be used to support a collaborative learning environment. Wikis can be used to facilitate the computer - supported collaborative learning process to enhance education and research (Parker and chao, 2007)
            According to Flanagan and Calandra, Wikis and other online collaboration tools can be used in the classroom for a variety of uses, but Wikis, in particular, may not be as directly applicable to classroom objectives as Blogs are, due to the nature of allowing anyone to make edits. Here are some ways to engage students to collaborate online.
              Class Notes. Let students contribute their notes to a central repository that is available for all to refer to, whether at home or at school.
              Exploration. Discover new topics together. By enabling anyone to contribute links and text, course materials can be built as you go.
              Teamwork. Build a class project collaboratively, requiring the entire class to contribute to the building of the final presentation.
              Documentation. Maintain a journal of work performed on group projects.
              Integrity. Instil trust in the group by knowing that the entire project may be deleted by any editor at any time.
              Inclusive. Create a sense of accomplishment knowing that everyone can contribute (Flanagan and Calandra, 2007).

 Blogs
According to Duffy and Bruns, blogs have a large range of potential use in higher education and research suggests that their growing popularity might help students to accomplish some of their learning activities more effectively. The structure of a blog facilitates the students’ ability to demonstrate critical thinking, and make sophisticated use of language and design elements. The potential educational uses of blogs first in a personal academic perspective where a blog can support reflection on teaching experiences, classified descriptions of resources and methodologies, ramblings regarding professional challenges and teaching tips for other academics, and illustration of particular technology issues to other colleagues.
            Blog also can support a common online presence for unit-related information such as calendars, events, assignments, and resources. Similarly they can support an online area for students to post contact details and queries relating to assignments. Within a pedagogical perspective a blog can support comments based on literature readings and student responses as well as to provide a collaborative space for students to act as reviewers for course-related materials.
            Schools can utilize blogs in a number of ways, from informing students on upcoming events, to discussing topics of interest to all students or particular classes. Teachers can use Blogs to post homework assignments, course materials and additional resources. Language teachers are utilizing Student Blogs to track and publish creative writing assignments, short stories and poetry. Because Blog posts are automatically stamped with the time and date, you’ll know who waited until the last minute to do a week’s worth of assignments. Turn your students into reporters and have them document daily events at school, sporting contests, and other activities (Duffy& Bruns, 2006).

 Podcasting
According to Ractham & Zhang, Podcasting is becoming a new learning paradigm in the academic environment in which material such as a course lectures can be recorded into audio and video files and delivered to subscribing users automatically. In University of Sydney podcasting was used to support postgraduate students in the Faculty of Economics and Business. Podcasting has been used in Duke University primarily for disseminating recorded lectures and discussions. Video podcast can also be used when teaching a topic that involves psychomotor skills or many visuals (Ractham & Zhang, 2006).

 RSS
Duffy & Bruns (2006) suggest a significant number of different ways in which RSS feeds can be useful in an educational context that was specified by Harrsch (2003). For instance students and lecturers may get an updates from wikis, blogs and research sites that are relevant to their course topics.
Also Duffy & Bruns (2006) state that RSS feed allows teachers to obtain any updates of new content added to students’ blogs without visiting their sites, also students can subscribe to the feeds of their friends, peers and teachers. Furthermore lecturers and students can set up RSS feeds for assignment topics and areas of research interests.

 Mashups
Most of the research that is reported appears to suggest that mashups are not being widely used in education. And there are little findings regarding application of mashups in education although they seem to have potential uses like other Web 2.0 tools. For instance it has been indicated that in cartographic higher education mashups are built to help the mapmaking process. Moreover there are also suggestions that mashups applications like Google Earth might have potential uses in education. For example they can provide educators with a means to assess and reinforce the students’ visual literacy. Also it can help them develop a context for spatial and cultural differences around the world. (Flanagan and Calandra, 2007).


WEB 1.0 VS WEB 2.0 

Adopted from http// Google search/ www.google.com/



NEED FOR THE STUDY
The World Wide Web and Internet technology in general, is constantly evolving. Growing from early roots as a relatively static network of hyperlinked documents, Web 2.0 refers to a perceived second-generation of Web-based technologies including online communities, wikis, forums, blogs and chat rooms technology which combines to form the basis for online social networking. Although the name, “Web 2.0” suggests that there is a newer version of the Internet, in truth, there is no specific Web 2.0 program or software. No upgrades are required, and you won’t find system specifications for it. Web 2.0 is merely a commonly used marketing label for the rich interactivity that many online destinations now offer to their members. Most of the technologies people think of when describing Web 2.0, such as live, real-time databases, content editors that allow instantaneous worldwide publishing and interactive communities with blogs, forums and chat room have been available since the earliest days of the Web.
Web 2.0 technology is very useful for present and future generation’s teachers and students. So the investigator can select the topic “WEB 2.0- AN EFFECTIVE PLATFORM FOR LEARNING ENGLISH LANGUAGE: A SURVEY ON POST GRADUATE STUDENTS’’
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
The title for the study is “WEB 2.0- AN EFFECTIVE PLATFORM FOR LEARNING ENGLISH LANGUAGE: A SURVEY ON POST GRADUATE STUDENTS”
OPERATIONAL DEFINITION OF KEY TERMS
The investigator wants to give explanations for the terms used in the title of the study.
Web 2.0 Technologies:
This term states a renaissance for web resources and tools by containing collaboration and social interaction. Web 2.0 includes community learning and collaborative learning in a social process.  There has been shift from a World Wide Web that is “read only (web 1.0)” to a Web that is being described as the “Read Write Web (web 2.0).”
Survey:
            Research or investigation of an Educational problem making use of scientific methods of sampling and carefully planned methods of questioning. A survey is a famous method of scientific investigation in which large samples of people answer questions. Research methods that involves asking questions about opinion, beliefs or behaviour.
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
GENERAL OBJECTIVES
   To find out the year of experiences in computer usage among the PG students
         To find out the year of experiences in internet usage among PG students
         To find out the frequency of the PG students experience with internet.
         To find out the purpose for which the PG students use the internet.
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
1.      To find out whether there is any significant difference in the mean scores of learning English language through web 2.0 applications among the postgraduate students with respect to their year of studying.
2.      To find out whether there is any significant difference in the mean scores of learning English language through web 2.0 applications among the postgraduate students with respect to their course of study. 
3.      To find out whether there is any significant difference in the mean scores of learning English language through web 2.0 applications among the postgraduate students with respect to their residence of the students.
4.      To find out whether there is any significant difference in the mean scores of learning English language through web 2.0 applications among the postgraduate students with respect to their locality of the institution.
5.      To find out whether there is any significant difference in the mean scores of learning English language through web 2.0 applications among the postgraduate students with respect to their types of management.
6.      To find out whether there is any significant difference in the mean scores of learning English language through web 2.0 applications among the postgraduate students with respect to their father’s Educational qualification.
HYPOTHESES OF THE STUDY
            The hypotheses of the present study a formulated as follows:
1.      There is no significant difference in the mean scores of learning English language through web 2.0 applications among the postgraduate students with respect to their course of study.
2.      There is no significant difference in the mean scores learning English language through web 2.0 applications among the postgraduate students with respect to their year of studying.
3.      There is no significant difference in the mean scores of learning English language through web 2.0 applications among the postgraduate students with respect to their type of management.
4.      There is no significant difference in the mean scores of learning English language through web 2.0 applications among the postgraduate students with respect to their residence of the students.
5.      There is no significant difference in the mean scores of learning English language through web 2.0 applications among the postgraduate students with respect to their locality of the institution.
6.      There is no significant association between Fathers’ Education and their children’s learning English language through web 2.0 applications.
LIMITATION OF THE STUDY:
Even though every attempt has been made to make the study more precise & objective as possible, the investigator in the present study noted a few limitations. The following are the important limitation.
1.            The present study was restricted to P.G arts & science College students of Tirunelveli District
2.            The study was conducted among the P.G arts & science College students and not extended to other students studying in engineering college because of various constraints.
3.            Even though, collecting data being a complex phenomenon, involving a variety of variables, so the study had been limited to a few selected variables such as nature of the College, type of the management and Educational qualification.
ORGANIZATION OF THE DISSERTATION
            The study is reported in five chapters.
Ø  The first chapter introduces the research study besides providing a theoretical framework of the study.
Ø  The second chapter presents a review of conceptual and research studies which have been completed in India and abroad in the area taken for the study
Ø  The third chapter deals with procedures of research adopter for present investigation
Ø  The fourth chapter presents the analysis and interpretations of data.
Ø  The fifth chapter summaries the findings of the study and suggestions and recommendations that emerge from the finding are also discussed.
CONCLUSION
Theoretical framework of the study is given in the first chapter. The next chapter deals with the Review of related literature.          


REFERENCES

BOOKS
Ramesh Bangia (2001) “Fundamentals of programming languages’ cybe tech publications, New Delhi.
Rohit Anand (2005) Internet Education, International Scientific Publishing Academy, New Delhi.
Sharma, B.M. (2004) Net oriented education, Akansha Publishing House, New Delhi.
Thiyagu.K  (2007) Information and Communication Technology, Prophet Publishers, Trichy.
 

No comments:

Post a Comment